I was recently asked by someone who managed a twitter
account for a small organization what they were supposed to tweet if they don’t
have anything to say. My response was “why do you have Twitter?” Apparently in
person I’m slightly less eloquent than if I have time to think about it and
write it down. I thought I’d go ahead and respond to this person’s question in
a less arrogant manor.
Think of the internet like a giant convention. You are in a
room full of people and information. Your goal is to connect and interact with
as many potential clients as possible to promote your business (P.S. if you’re
looking for work, your organization is you, and your clients are companies and
recruiters). You have a booth. The booth
is your company’s website. It has all kinds of information about your
organization including contact information for head office and the contact
information of your employees attending the convention. You brought several
employees to this event.
Employee 1: Facebook
Facebook is the most well-known of all your employees. He is
connected to the most people, is the life of the party and everyone’s best
friend. They all interact with this guy. He’s great to have around, but sadly
he suffers from ADHD. When he seeks someone out directly he’s able to focus and
get your message across to that person. In a crowd of people his message gets
lost. He often stops to play games with people or show them pictures of his
kids doing idiotic things like learning to crawl or enjoying their first few
moments of life. Sometimes amongst all of the things he’s trying to do, your
message doesn’t really reach anyone. He’s
probably the first point of contact for a lot of your audience, but he’s
definitely not the most effective.
Employee 2: LinkedIn
This guy is all business. He wore a three-piece suit to a
business casual event, and is shaking the hands of all your employees,
potential job applicants, representatives of affiliate companies, and everyone
who is looking to make business connections. However, these are the only people
who will talk to him. Because of his “all work and no play” attitude, he is not
able to effectively engage people who are just there to mingle and have a good
time. Those girls in the back who could probably benefit from your product or
service are shying away from him, opting to hang out with Facebook, who is
showing them how to play Bejeweled.
Employee 3: Twitter
This is your most efficient employee. In 140 characters or
less, he spits out data in a way that lets everyone in range hear and
understand exactly what your message is. There is no long drawn out
conversation. He generates interest and steers traffic to your booth, where
people can learn more about you. His message is also the easiest for others to
share with their entire network, and he politely reciprocates by sharing their
message as well. He does often get off topic, but your message is there. He
lets people know he has pictures of his dog, but lets them decide whether to
view them or not. Though not as much fun as Facebook, he’s a healthy balance
between business and fun. Just don’t ask him to organize your contact list, it
seems so easy, but he just doesn’t do it (I feel like he could if he tried
though).
Your newest employee is a little less distracted than Facebook.
Of all of your employees he is certainly the best at organizing your contacts,
but he doesn’t have the network of Facebook or the efficiency of Twitter. Don’t
count this guy out because he’s new. His affiliation with Google means he has a
lot of potential. At some point he will be the main hub for all interaction
with Google, giving him the potential to surpass Facebook’s network, and his
Android affiliation could make him a more mobile friendly app than Twitter
someday.
You would not expect employees to run around and hand out
business cards and not engage with anyone. You should be using this same logic
with your social networking tools. They are in fact, “networking” tools and not
just promotional tools. When you’re asking the question “what do I tweet.” ask
the question, what would I tell my employees to say if they ran into someone
who knew/didn’t know what my organization does and how it can help them? Treat
it like a conversation. It evolves as your interact with your clients.
This is a pretty interesting view on what one might consider the various social networks to represent.
ReplyDeleteWhat happens when an employee has all these social networks? If you just have one, is it just as efficient?
Thanks Iain. It would be more "effective" to have all of them as you would be able to converse with a broader audience(Ex: Some people who have LinkedIn will not have Twitter).
ReplyDeleteIt is only more efficient if you are interacting with all of them on a regular basis. When an account is inactive for weeks, it could be assumed that the owner does not check it often, which reduces the likelyhood that someone will appempt to engage with it. It's like being at the convention and wearing a nametag, but not saying anything....kind of useless.